CliqueClack TV
TV SHOWS COLUMNS FEATURES CHATS QUESTIONS

What’s this show called … Suits?

Each week I review a show that's new to me. Good idea, or punishment (mine or yours)? You be the judge. But either way, if I had to watch it, the least you can do is read what I have to say....

This wasn’t the original plan. Initially I intended to write this week’s column about the Biography channel series I Survived…. I’ll admit that, in part, I was a little scared to watch the episode that I recorded, but the real turning point in my plan came as I was watching the premiere of the new USA Network series, Suits.

There was something about the show that made me want to focus on it this week, and not just the fact that, by and large, I’ve been pretty satisfied with most of the original programming coming out of that new hits factory. I love legal shows, and Mike (Patrick J. Adams) and Harvey (Gabriel Macht) can’t help but remind one of Peter and Neal from White Collar. Plus USA knows how to do TV, right?

And plenty of people enjoyed it, including our very own Carla. In fact, I’ve read numerous different reviews about how great an attempt at a buddy show Suits is, how familiar yet fresh, smart, funny, etc.

I don’t get it.

I wasn’t sure at first what it was about the show that I didn’t like. I just figured that, like Covert Affairs, it was an innovative whiff. No big deal, easy enough to move on. Sure the conceit makes no sense — Mike’s photographic memory is so amazing that Harvey can’t imagine finding someone else as impressive with, you know, a law degree? His lack of any and all credentials for the job because of the poor choices he made a few years back remind Harvey of himself when he was a troublemaking law student at Harvard? — but that’s all harmless enough. Although, even as I’m okay with stretches, you couldn’t tug the taffy far enough to drag it through all the twists, turns, and mental leaps necessary to get from “A” to “B” on this one.

But even that’s okay. So is casting Rick Hoffman, who’s never really been a welcome face in my book. So what was so “miss” about it for me? Finally it dawned on me: the buddy pairing.

Think about it: Mike’s a kid who was so desperate to make $25,000 that he agreed to sell a briefcase full of pot for his friend. He’s been kicked out of school, he cheats on the LSATs for money, and he has nothing qualifying him for a job as a law firm associate save for above average intellect.

Meanwhile, Harvey’s a senior partner at Mike’s new firm, one who’s known as the best closer around. He’s smart, tough, successful, and totally doesn’t need someone like Mike around, no matter how many statutes the guy can memorize. But wait … what’s Harvey’s problem? Right — he doesn’t empathize with his clients, and he’s on thin ice for his questionable methods. So bring on the mother of them all: sending an attorney into court who has no license or even provisional license to be there. Awesome.

But even if Harvey was selling Mike as a paralegal, Suits would leave me scratching my head. Shawn and Gus (Psych) are partners, even if Shawn’s been “1A” to Gus’ “3C” for the life of the series. Peter and Neal (White Collar) are partners, even as Peter’s the cop and Neal’s the con. Hell, even Mary and Marshall (In Plain Sight) are technically partners, even if Mary’s a horrible human being who treats everyone, including Marshall, as her inferior. But on Suits, Harvey’s about nineteen levels above Mike, even if Mike is Harvey’s “personal” associate. They only stand on even ground when they’re literally standing on even ground. The fact that each holding something over the other’s head is the only thing that’s keeping their farce going right now is far from the makings of a solid duo.

But spending over an hour watching a bad show isn’t what prodded me to focus my column on Suits this week. Rather it was this: in no way does Suits continue the fine tradition that USA Network has established for itself. To say that it picks the ball up on fine TV duos like Shawn and Gus, and Peter and Neal is to minimize the creativity that goes into those latter two pairings, among others. They’re strong, complimentary, and they work as a cohesive unit. Harvey and Mike have a lot of time ahead of them to get there, and maybe they will, but there wasn’t anything about the initial setup that says they’re there, or that guarantees their ability to ever make it there.

It’s pretty easy to pick out a bad carbon copy, and there’s nothing wrong with expecting a version that looks like an original. We don’t need multiple new shows a year from the little network that could; quality over quantity’s always king.

Photo Credit: USA Network

17 Responses to “What’s this show called … Suits?”

June 27, 2011 at 4:37 PM

I think you missed the part where he said that he passed the bar exam. he doesn’t have a degree, but he passed the bar. I am pretty sure that means he is credentialed, but I’m sure that differs from state to state. It may not even work that way at all any more, but I’m willing to accept that in this fictional world, in New York, when you pass the bar, you are credentialed and licensed to practice law.

June 27, 2011 at 7:01 PM

In the initial interview, right? I think Mike was saying that as proof of competency; in most states — I have to imagine NY is one of them — prerequisites for admission to the state bar include an undergrad degree, a JD, and passing the bar exam itself. Did Mike even get his BA, because he mentioned being kicked out of school for selling that math test…. Certainly he’s missing the JD, which means he’d probably have a hard time getting licensed to practice in NY state.

June 27, 2011 at 8:41 PM

This is not definitive but it seems from this blog that New York is one of the states that does not require law school to pass the bar.

https://studyfor.com/bar-exam/can-i-take-bar-exam-lawyer-without-going-law-school-234/

June 27, 2011 at 8:49 PM

Check out NY State’s Bar Association site; according to them admittance requires at least some amount of law school study, either with a degree or combined with a clerkship, or a degree or study from a foreign law school. But “all of which require at least some form of classroom study in a law school. ” And, I assume, a bachelors degree….

https://www.nybarexam.org/Eligible/Eligibility.htm

June 28, 2011 at 12:06 PM

I get it–you don’t like it, and I agree it is not the caliber of White Collar, but I don’t find many shows-Network, or Cable, that are. That said, I found it fun and actually, quite entertaining to watch. I know I prefer it to Franklin and Bash, even though that show is maybe a little more realistic. What I found particularly surprising, was many of my friends enjoyed it and recommended that I add it to my list. This is coming from people that I can’t get to watch either White Collar, or Covert Affairs. Bye the way, is the major plot line of Plain Sight because the star is going to have a baby, and they had to work it this way–if so, okay, if not, this is one viewer that is less than happy about it.

June 28, 2011 at 3:14 PM

I haven’t watched In Plain Sight for a few seasons, so I can’t help you there, but I’ve actually been watching Franklin and Bash. Now that I can see calling “fun and actually, quite entertaining to watch.” Plus, their partnership makes sense! :)

June 28, 2011 at 4:10 PM

Regarding In Plain Sight, Mary McCormack is pregnant and the show decided to write in the storyline. She didn’t tell the writers until after the season started.

I like both Suits and Franklin & Bash for different reasons. Suits, I think will be more about the characters and their relationships, while F&B is focused on the case of the week and getting laughs. The partnerships in the two show are entirely different as well.

June 28, 2011 at 6:41 PM

I like “Suits”.

June 28, 2011 at 8:25 PM

Aryeh S & Carla Day–Thank you both, I will be continuing to watch both. I do watch Franklin & Bash. It took me a while to place the Franklin actor, until someone reminded me he was part of the cast of the last few episodes of NYPD Blue–that was some time ago, and he still has kept a young profile.

June 29, 2011 at 1:09 PM

I didn’t know that Breckin Meyer (Franklin) was on NYPD Blue; I mainly know him from the movie Road Trip. But Mark-Paul Gosselaar (Bash) did do some time on Blue the final few seasons … he was also Zack on Saved by the Bell way back when, and more recently on shows like Commander in Chief and Raising the Bar.

June 28, 2011 at 10:46 PM

All i can say is that i can’t believe that USA Network pushed back season 6 of Psych to the fall for this trash!!

Psych is still the best, the funniest and most original show on the Network.

June 29, 2011 at 12:12 AM

I’m diggin the show “Suits” I plan to watch every episode. I have 100% accuracy at calling what shows will make it and which shows won’t. Suits will be a hit.

June 29, 2011 at 11:21 PM

I think you’re missing the whole “Harvey see’s something in Mike.” Like, Harvey looks out at the other interviewees and turns around and says that he’ll hire Mike. True, it’s not a logical move but three points make me believe in this show, 1. Harvey doesn’t usually work logically. lying to a client, not smart, but he does it because he thinks it’s right. In the same way, he hires Mike, regardless of the fact that he may get caught. 2. Harvey bounces off the things Mike says. When Harvey’s about to fire Mike, Mike convinces him not too right? Then Harvey, using Mike’s logic, convinces Jessica to not fire him. I don’t know, that says something to me. And 3. Harvey see’s something in Mike that he empathizes with. and i’m waiting to find out what it is, but there definitely is something similar between the two because a. Harvey tells Donna that he wants “another him”. b. Jessica brings up the whole “when i hired you, you were a screwup!” i think that this show will clear things up as it goes along.

June 30, 2011 at 12:04 PM

I understand that Harvey sees something in Mike, but there’s hiring someone who’s not qualified for a job, and then there’s hiring someone who’s very presence in said job could make you lose your own license to practice your chosen profession.

If Harvey had wanted to he could have hired Mike as a paralegal and paid for him to go to law school at night. As a paralegal Mike could pretty much do the exact same job as he’s been hired to do as an associate, and no one would end up being disbarred and/or sued for malpractice, fraud, etc. And would that have changed the show so dramatically? I don’t think so.

June 30, 2011 at 1:22 PM

thats true, but i still like the show. I can overlook that and enjoy it, but i completely understand how that doesn’t make sense

June 30, 2011 at 1:30 PM

and also, i’m fourteen and love Patrick J Adams… so this show could be about the mating rituals of anteaters and i’d still watch it lol

September 25, 2011 at 10:49 AM

I don’t like ‘suits’. I LOVE IT!!!!!

Powered By OneLink